- a sequence change where, compared to a reference sequence, one or more nucleotides are not present (deleted).
Format: “prefix”“position(s)_deleted”“del”, e.g. r.123_127del
“prefix” = reference sequence used = r.
“position(s)_deleted” = position nucleotide or range of nucleotides deleted = 123_127
“del” = type of change is a deletion = del 1
- prefix reference sequences accepted are r. (coding and non-coding RNA).
- the “position(s)_deleted” should contain two different positions, e.g. 123_126 but not 123_123.
- the “position(s)_deleted” should be listed from 5’ to 3’, e.g. 123_126 but not 126_123.
- 1 = see Uncertain; when the postion and/or the sequence of a deletion has not been defined, a description may have a format like r.(100_150)del(15)
- for all descriptions the most 3’ position possible of the reference sequence is arbitrarily assigned to have been changed (3’rule)
- the 3’rule also applies for changes in single residue stretches and tandem repeats (nucleotide or amino acid)
- the 3’rule applies to ALL descriptions (genome, gene, transcript and protein) of a given variant
- one nucleotide - LRG_199t1:r.10del
- a deletion of the U at position r.10 in the reference sequence LRG_199t1
- NOTE: it is allowed to describe the variant as r.10delu
- several nucleotides - NM_004006.2:r.6_8del
- a deletion of nucleotides r.6 to r.8 in the reference sequence NM_004006.2
- NOTE: it is allowed to describe the variant as r.6_8deluug
- the predicted deletion of exon 30 (starting at position r.4072) to exon 36 (ending at position r.5145) of the DMD-gene; RNA has not been analysed
- a mosaic case where from position r.6 to r.8 besides the normal sequence also transcripts are found containing a deletion of this sequence
- NOTE: for the predicted consequences of a variant the description is LRG_199t1:r.(=/6_8del)
Can I use r.123del6 to describe a 6 nucleotide deletion?
No, a deletion of more than one residue should mention the first and last residue deleted, separated using the range symbol ("_", underscore), e.g. r.123_128del and not r.123del6.
Is the description of a deletion of exon 17 as r.EX17del still allowed?
A description like r.EX17del has never been allowed. Descriptions should be specific and indicate the nucleotides affected by the change.